Assessments

Scored project assessments

A calculator answers a bounded question. An assessment scores a whole position, interprets it against bands, and tells you what to do next. Everything runs in your browser.

Want the fast version? Project Health Quick Score on the calculators page gives the weighted number only — no recommendations or PDF.

Assessment context

Project nameProject typeContract valueProject stage

WATCH73.15

HEALTHY

80–100

WATCH

60–79

AT RISK

40–59

CRITICAL

0–39

Points lost

26.85

out of 100 available

Biggest drag

Schedule

−7.60 points

Categories below 60

of 7 categories

To reach next band

6.85

points to HEALTHY

Weighted contribution

Safety17.60

Schedule12.40

Cost14.20

Quality11.85

Risk5.40

Client Satisfaction8.30

Contractor Performance3.40

Shortfall26.85

Score each category · 0–100

Safety20%

Incident rate, leading indicators, compliance

17.60 / 20

weighted

HEALTHY

−2.40 pts

Schedule20%

Programme adherence, float, critical path

12.40 / 20

weighted

WATCH

−7.60 pts

Cost20%

CPI, EAC accuracy, contingency drawdown

14.20 / 20

weighted

WATCH

−5.80 pts

Quality15%

Defect and re-work rate, ITP compliance

11.85 / 15

weighted

WATCH

−3.15 pts

Risk10%

5.40 / 10

weighted

AT RISK

−4.60 pts

Client Satisfaction10%

Responsiveness, communication, relationship

8.30 / 10

weighted

HEALTHY

−1.70 pts

Contractor Performance5%

Resourcing, responsiveness, delivery

3.40 / 5

weighted

WATCH

−1.60 pts

Weakest areas

Ranked by points lost, not by raw score

A 62 on a 20%-weighted category costs more than a 54 on a 10% one — weight decides where the effort goes.

1
Schedule
score 62 · weight 20%
−7.60
WATCH
2
Cost
score 71 · weight 20%
−5.80
WATCH
3
Risk
score 54 · weight 10%
−4.60
AT RISK
4
Quality
score 79 · weight 15%
−3.15
WATCH

Generated recommendations

5 actions from this scoring

ScheduleMEDIUM

WATCH — 62/100

Run a six-week look-ahead with constraint analysis (Last Planner). Track PPC weekly — a falling PPC predicts the slip before the master programme shows it.

Weight 20% · costing 7.6 points · act this week

CostLOW

WATCH — 71/100

Review the CPI trend rather than the point value, and reconcile committed cost against certified value. Confirm every variation over threshold has written instruction.

Weight 20% · costing 5.8 points · act this week

RiskMEDIUM

AT RISK — 54/100

Full risk register review with owners present. Every red risk needs a named owner, a dated mitigation and a defined trigger — a risk with no trigger is not being managed.

Weight 10% · costing 4.6 points · act this month

QualityLOW

WATCH — 79/100

Trend defects by trade and zone, and tighten first-fix inspections. A rising re-work count is a capability signal, not a scheduling one.

Weight 15% · costing 3.1 points · act this month

Contractor PerformanceLOW

WATCH — 68/100

Introduce a monthly performance scorecard reviewed with the contractor's PM. Score resourcing, quality, programme adherence and responsiveness separately.

Weight 5% · costing 1.6 points · monitor

Calculation

How this score was produced

Category	Score	Weight	Weighted	Points lost	Status
Safety	88	20%	17.60	2.40	HEALTHY 88
Schedule	62	20%	12.40	7.60	WATCH 62
Cost	71	20%	14.20	5.80	WATCH 71
Quality	79	15%	11.85	3.15	WATCH 79
Risk	54	10%	5.40	4.60	AT RISK 54
Client Satisfaction	83	10%	8.30	1.70	HEALTHY 83
Contractor Performance	68	5%	3.40	1.60	WATCH 68
Total		100%	73.15	26.85

Weighted score = Score × Weight ÷ 100. Final = sum of all weighted scores. Points lost = Weight × (100 − Score) ÷ 100.